Ainius Sabaliauskas vs Mihailo Savic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When it comes to second serve performance in recent months, Savic hasn't won any points, while Sabaliauskas has a 46.73% success rate. Is this an important factor? Definitely, as it has significant implications for predicting the match outcome.
• In return games, Savic also falls short with 0% of points won against opponents' second serves, in contrast to Sabaliauskas's 41.61% success rate.
• First serve return stats further highlight Savic's struggles with 0% success, while Sabaliauskas achieves 23.3%, which can be a decisive factor in head-to-head matchups.
• Under pressure situations, Savic has saved none of the breakpoints, whereas Sabaliauskas has a solid 57.14% save rate. How does this impact match predictions? It strongly favors Sabaliauskas in game pressure scenarios.
• In terms of overall match wins over the last year, Savic has a slight edge with 54.55% wins compared to Sabaliauskas's 52.63%, offering a closer look at their overall competitiveness.
• Surface preferences show that Savic excels on Hard surfaces (50% win rate) but struggles on Clay (41%). Conversely, Sabaliauskas performs best on Clay (52%) and worst on Indoor Hard (40%).
• Both players have recently played in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with Savic achieving a marginally better win ratio of 54.55% compared to Sabaliauskas's 52.63%.
• When considering the quality of opponents over the past year, Savic has faced average-rank opponents of 0, while Sabaliauskas has competed against higher-ranked adversaries (average rank 138.84), which might give Sabaliauskas a competitive edge.
• If this match reaches a deciding set, Sabaliauskas again has a slight advantage with a 54% success rate compared to Savic's 50%.
• Examining recent form, Savic hasn't converted any break points, while Sabaliauskas has a conversion rate of 31.25%, indicating a potential edge in critical moments of the match.

Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):

Given the current statistics, Sabaliauskas exhibits a superior performance in several critical areas such as second serve points, return games, and under-pressure situations. These edge factors are crucial for predicting match outcomes.

While Savic maintains a slightly better win percentage over the past year, their lack of effectiveness in converting breakpoints and winning key points under pressure severely hampers their outlook.

Considering the head-to-head context, surface preferences, and quality of opponents faced, Sabaliauskas appears better equipped for this matchup.

Based on these factual insights, Sabaliauskas is the likely winner of the upcoming tennis match.